Greater China reacts to Reporters Without Borders’ Press Freedom Index

January 31, 2013Jazza John3 Comments, , , , , ,

Jazza John, our contributor, is currently a student at National Chengchi University in Taiwan.

report from Reporters Without Boarders suggests that freedom of the press in both Hong Kong and Taiwan has dropped.  The Press Freedom Index, which is compiled of 179 nations, showed Hong Kong drop from 54 to 58 and Taiwan from 45 to 48, while Mainland China was elevated from 174 to 173. Finland maintained its position at the top of the list while Iran, Syria, Somalia and North Korea all positioned lower than China.

RWB

In an interview with the BBC’s Chinese service, Hong Kongese academic Willy Lam suggested that this drop was attributed to the influence of increased business links between the Mainland and the two independently governed regions of Taiwan and Hong Kong.

He reportedly told the BBC,

“Freedom of the press in Hong Kong has been decreasing ever since the hand over from the British in 1997. Heads of Hong Kong’s main media companies have significant investments on the Mainland, they don’t want to get on the wrong side of China, so they will often practice self-censorship and won’t cover stories that could upset Beijing.”

He also suggested that Beijing aimed to build close links with the editors and owners of Hong Kong’s media providers so as to liaise information back to the Chinese capital. As a result he said that the amount of negative news stories in Hong Kong directed at the Mainland had reduced.

Despite its drop in the rankings, Taiwanese media celebrated holding onto the title of the freest press in Asia with its closest competitors being South Korea and Japan, positioned 50th and 53rd respectively, with most other Asian countries trailing in the rankings.

In China, state media clam up about the index. “Reporters Without Borders” has been listed by Sina Weibo as a “sensitive word” and is therefore not searchable. But Chinese netizens’ views of the hideous ranking that China has got run the whole gamut, with some snubbing it as a Western dirty trick to demonize China, some expressing incredulity and the rest using dark humor or hand-wringing about the doomsday for Chinese press. From Sina Weibo:

“Imperialist countries certainly will rank socialist countries at the very bottom.”

“Have Westerners ever given China any fair judgment?”

“At least our country ranks the third among socialist countries!”

“I personally feel the press freedom in China is much greater than many would imagine, or at lease on some topics. Then whether this ranking is fair is open to question.”

“This (173rd) is a rather ironic number when put together with GDP…”

“That’s too much. It (China) should be at least out of the bottom 10.[嘻嘻]

“We don’t have media but propaganda; we don’t have Internet but Intranet; we don’t have freedom but censorship.”

“I personally believe that too much freedom is not a good thing We’ll probably see more commentary like that regarding [Chinese Nobel Laureate of Literature] Mo Yan, saying that one can’t produce great works in these kind of conditions.”

“This decline will continue until Communism falls.”

 Hong Kongese netizens also shared their own views online,

“Of course it’s going to be like this, it would be a wonder if we don’t get influenced by the Mainland. Reporters are being beaten and detained by the police. What is said on TV and on Radio is being distorted as we speak!” 

“The media reports about us losing our freedom every day, it’s only rational that Hong Kongese media’s freedom is also being taken away.”

Related articles:

3 comments to “Greater China reacts to Reporters Without Borders’ Press Freedom Index”

  1. Blacksoth | January 31, 2013 | Permalink Reply

    I wonder how many of those that think that “too much freedom is a bad thing” are 50 cent workers.

    To be fair, the rankings may not reflect the level of citizen journalism in China, which is rather impressive and seems to grow despite the overwhelming censorship.

  2. Richard | February 1, 2013 | Permalink Reply

    It should be pointed out that RSF itself isn’t exactly a saint themselves:

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2005/05/17/reporters-without-borders-unmasked/
    http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/1312/the-reporters-without-borders-press-freedom-index-independent-assessment-or-eu-propaganda-part-i

    It has close ties with US intelligence agencies and spends almost a disproportionate time attacking US’s political enemies such as Cuba and Venezuela. It’s also receives massive funding from various organizations within European Union, especially the French government, and has been accused as a source of EU propaganda considering that the top “free” countries are mostly European.

    As for Hong Kong, I don’t see how it can rank behind Niger considering the existence of trash tabloids like Apply Daily and East Week which would make ones in the UK blush. There is a large dependency when Hong Kong ranks first in the Index of Economic Freedom, published by the conservative Heritage Foundation and WSJ.

    • tangxin | February 5, 2013 | Permalink Reply

      That or the EU really is amongst most free countries in the world. Are you quoting counterpunch in an effort to dispel bias?

Leave a Reply